| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vol. 3 No.
5 "India is the cradle of the human race... " - Mark Twain |
||||||||
| |
||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
||||||
| |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Worth
Repeating
When we saw the television pictures of the Taj Mahal hotel in flames, it was not the 1993 blasts we thought of. It was 9/11. It sounds flip and glib to say that these attacks constitute India’s 9/11. But that, in fact, is the truth. The significance of 9/11 was that it made Americans conscious of the danger they were in and aware that nothing was safe; that terrorists could destroy such powerful symbols of American prestige as the World Trade Center. In our case, 26/11 has had the same impact. By striking at the heart of prosperous and largely peaceful south Bombay, the terrorists have served notice that there is nothing they cannot do, and nowhere that they cannot reach... Guesswork in the aftermath of a tragedy is always a risky business. But I wager that when the time comes to write the history of modern India, 26/11 will be remembered as the turning point in our attitude to terror. It will be remembered as the day when we Indians came to terms with vulnerability... And, with a bit of luck, as the day when we demanded that those in charge of protecting us either did the job they were supposed to or left it to somebody more capable. The government must realise that this is not just another terrorist strike. This one has changed all the rules, both in terms of the impact it has had on the Indian psyche and in the anger and fear that now course through our veins. No more promises. No more speeches. It’s time to act... All over the world, terrorism is fought through intelligence. A good security service penetrates terrorist cells, monitors radio traffic and picks up intelligence about terrorist activity. The Bombay attacks prove that we have the worst intelligence service of any major power in the world. These attacks were meticulously planned, involved two dozen attackers, many more terrorists in back-up roles, vast quantities of arms and ammunition and, probably, crores in funding... The aim of the Bombay terrorists was to continue the global jihad on Indian soil. That’s why they sought out American and British passport holders and that’s why Israelis and Jews were among the principal targets of the violence. Combine that shift in emphasis with the sophistication of these attacks and some conclusions become inevitable. Clearly, these terrorists were funded and, probably, armed and trained by global jihadi forces. These were not angry students making homemade bombs. These were world-class terrorists. That should tell us that India is now part of the global terrorist battleground. If the international jihadi network decides to treat us on par with Israel, England, America and other countries that are seen as enemies of its twisted version of Islam, then the Bombay attacks may only be a beginning. Worse may follow.
The iceberg of jihadi terrorism has struck not only Mumbai, but also the Indian State. The iceberg moved from Uttar Pradesh to Jaipur; from Jaipur to Bangalore; from Bangalore to Ahmedabad and Surat; from there to Delhi; from Delhi to Assam and to Mumbai — despite the claims made by the Mumbai Police some weeks ago of having discovered and crushed a plot of the IM to carry out strikes in Mumbai. The government of Manmohan Singh reacted to the repeated warning signals of this moving iceberg since November 2007, in the same way as the Bush Administration reacted to reports about the plans of al-Qaeda for an act of aviation terrorism in the US; in the same way Megawati Sukarnoputri reacted to reports of the activities of the Jemmah Islamiyah; and in the same way that Khaleda Zia reacted to reports of the plans of the Jamiat-ul-Mujahideen.
This reflects a genuine confusion, strategic and tactical. Tactically, there was no single command structure for the operations being conducted since Wednesday night; this led to delays, crossed connections and redundancies, the cost of each of which could be measured in lives. The army, the navy and the police were running chains of command parallel to the NSG. Strategically, the security of the harbour, India’s territorial waters and the coastline is divided up between the Customs, woefully under-weaponed; the Coast Guard, always smarting under what it sees as stepmotherly treatment and with designs on being a brown-water force; and the navy. Through the gaps in this structure the terrorists may have sailed to Colaba, making landfall dangerously close to the navy’s sheathed sword, the submarines of Western Command. In 1993, there was an outcry when 800 kg of RDX landed on the Indian coast and destabilised Mumbai. What’s changed since then? And who’s accountable if it hasn’t?
On November 24, defence minister A K Antony told a public gathering in Kochi that our land borders are secure but not the seas. His words turned out to be, unfortunately, prophetic. Intelligence reports suggest that the perpetrators of the terror operation in Mumbai came from the sea. In all probability, they sailed past the naval headquarters before running amok in the city. How did terrorists at least 20 of them seem to have come in rubber dinghies evade the entire security establishment? there is an urgent need for better coordination among various intelligence agencies and with the armed forces. This, however, is possible only if we have a major revamp of our security architecture. Many experts have outlined structural changes in the security establishment, like creating a federal agency, a centralised command structure and a nationwide information base with real-time access to security agencies. Besides, various wings of the security establishment have to be made autonomous and accountable. This country has witnessed scores of terror strikes since the 1980s and in the past three years alone, over 800 people have died in terror attacks. But not one public official in India has had to resign after a terror strike. Should security bosses, including the home minister, national security adviser and heads of agencies like RAW and IB, be so secure in their jobs when security personnel and civilians risk lives for their failures?
Support cops, win
terror war The Mumbai mayhem has underlined the unpreparedness of our police forces once again. Wednesday, 26 November, was yet another day when the world saw how helpless our police are when faced with a full-fledged war against terror. At the onset of the crisis, the Mumbai police, like the city itself, appeared shaken. Only with the arrival of its anti-terrorist squad and later commandos from various specialised units, did the operation take shape. Though badly prepared, the police were not short of initiative and valour. Constables and head constables reacted swiftly and saved numerous lives. In the process, at least 14 policemen died. Two IPS officers, including the chief of the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS), Hemant Karkare, were among them. This display of courage must have reassured people who saw ill-equipped policemen taking on well-trained fidayeen terrorists. Sadly their sacrifice was not sufficient to stop the terror that has already killed 155 people. The rapid growth of the terror network has surprised security agencies. They are facing sophisticated and tech-savvy terrorist groups. In comparison, capacity-building in the security set-up has been inadequate. As a result, only the motivation of officers like Karkare can be depended upon. It is important that in the war against terror, the police must get full support from the public. There is a general feeling that the police have been denied resources, appreciation and, most importantly, dignity. Karkare and Sharma, both officers who showed extreme courage and professional capability, symbolise the irony of Indian policing. Our police can win the war against terror if they are given support and protection, both physical and moral. At the moment they lack both.
In 1999, I was interviewing a young Muslim man whose family had been attacked by Hindu rioters, and who had subsequently joined the Muslim underworld. He told me about the coming worldwide war of Islam against its enemies, and its local manifestation in Bombay. “This time we will be fully prepared. We have all the equipment. The bhais (dons) will send ships with containers full of weapons.” I asked the gangster why he stayed in Bombay, if he thought it was so bad for Muslims. He peered out the one window at the grey and white walls of the Taj, and remarked: “The main thing in Bombay is money. There’s lots of it.” And this, when all is said and done, is why the terrorists keep attacking Bombay, and picked the top business hotel of this most commercial of cities to stage their spectacular: it is where money is made. Lots of it. |
Copyright
© Globalom Media 2008
Publisher and Managing Editor: Suresh
Jaura
Hosted and webdesigned by Globalom
Media